... Someone please please help! I had a REAL risk. Unprotected vagjnal sex with a guy who has slept with tons of girls. ... (5 replies)
... seconds without ejaculation. I know that many people say its only theoretical risk and there isn't real risk from this exposure, but i decided to get tested 6 weeks later and the test came negative. ... (4 replies)
... You never had a risk from the protected sex. Actually the PEP if you took it was more of a danger to your health. ... (4 replies)
... oral sex is not a valid risk of hiv transmission. ... (3 replies)
... Oral sex is not a real risk of HIV transmission and your tests have proved that already. ... (1 replies)
... you'd still say I had no real world risk because of the neutralisation performed by my saliva? ... (10 replies)
... in real life, I'll make sure to treat them just as I would anyone else. This has been a real lesson for me. Thanks again. ... (5 replies)
... The accuracy of any particular HIV test is only relevant in the event of a real risk of an HIV infection occurring. In your case however, this risk was not present, you did not put yourself at a risk of an HIV infection. Your 5 week test result was naturally negative as will be your 10 week test result. ... (13 replies)
... Doctors have told me the risk is low, but not impossible. When I've asked have they witnessed conversion from only oral, they've said no. ... (10 replies)
... The thing is I did penetrate her vaginally with no condom... and she also offered unprotected anal sex so her chances of having HIV are higher.... Since this occasion 11days ago I've been so ill to a point I've nearly called an ambulance in the night... ... (5 replies)
... If it was all protected sex, there is zero risk of HIV. Oral sex is zero risk of HIV. ... (5 replies)
... I understand that if there are swollen lymph glands in ARS it is usually general and not localized and I as no trained provider cannot tell for real anyway. ... (1 replies)
... Thank you, Kevin. I know the risk of 'false pozitive', and such a rezult would be devastating for me.. ... (5 replies)
... Kevin has already made clear oral sex is not a risk of HIV. In 30 years their have been no reliable cases of HIV from oral sex and that includes many studies with couples where one partner has HIV the other does not. ... (9 replies)
... Having herpes increases the chances of an infection in the event of a real full on risk. That being full blown unprotected sex with somebody who is known to be HIV positive and the HIV virus has been known to be passed on. ... (12 replies)
... use female escorts for massage, kissing, receiving unprotected or protected oral sex. I am still a virgin. I had routine blood tests for HIV in Sep 2011 and Jan 2012, and both tests came out negative. ... (13 replies)
... All these "symptoms" people freak themselves out over are nothing more than coincidental things that happened to appear after they had a real or peerceived risk. ... (10 replies)
... I would feel better if it was a good indication that my PCR report of negative at 18 days suggests I'm not risk for HIV. The antibody at this point was negative. ... (30 replies)
... a need to self punish can and often does bring about physical symptoms but it is impossible online to diagnose anything . It is absolute impossible to diagnose HIV based on the amount or lack of them. ... (30 replies)
... I think you issue here is guilt more so than the oral sex you had. The oral carrys no real risk and you are very much aware after reading the millions of posts about oral sex on this site alone. ... (30 replies)
