It appears you have not yet Signed Up with our community. To Sign Up for free, please click here....

Parenting Issues Message Board

Parenting Issues Board Index


Thanks to everyone that responded. I had an idea of where I thought I should go with this situation, and I guess I wanted to confirm that there was validity to my thinking and that I hadn't maybe overlooked something. Plus I was curious, since according to my son, I'm the only one that thinks this way - if that was true. From what I see, I'm not the only one:) And, having six other friends with kids the exact same age, I've always fallen more in the middle between 3 who are more strict and 3 who are less strict. What I see here mirrors that and is also evenly divided.

A lot of very good points were brought up. Yes, he is almost 18 and at that time, he will have no curfew. Therefore, in this next 3 months, I'm more than willing to make some compromises for this transition. Friday and Saturday nights, I have no problem extending the curfew, and I'm also willing to do so with one of the work nights, but not every night. There's a reason why it's called a 'work' night - and most adults do not get the opportunity to have 2 to 3 hours every night after work for themselves:) And if he's wide awake, he may want to try getting up a little earlier - as he's going to have to do in a few weeks when school starts:) Or, I can find some things for him to do around here which may help tire him out - as he lives here rent free and does virtually nothing in the way of chores (and that was one battle we didn't pursue). Plus, I too, am a parent that doesn't sleep until he comes home - and since I work way more hours than he does - he can deal with wide awake much better than I can with no sleep:) It's not that I can't always fall asleep when he's not here, but I've never allowed myself to do so. I guess I've always seen this scenario play out where I don't ensure that he got home, and he doesn't someday, and we don't know about it until sometime the next morning, while he's been lying in a ditch or we could have been looking for him - and I can see myself trying to explain to the police as we're filing a missing person's report how we, as parents, had no clue as to the fact that he never came home:)

Yet, there is one thing that is not going to happen until he is 18. He may be allowed to stay out - but his car will not be. My personal belief is that there is no reason to be out this late this many times a week. It's playing with fate and asking for trouble. Good kid, bad kid, drinks, doesn't drink, drugs, no drugs - it makes really no difference in that it only takes a split second. If they stay out 30 days in a row to an unreasonable hour, and 29 days they watch movies at a friend's - but the 30th day they decide to have alcohol, get in the car, drive drunk, and heaven help us, hurt themselves, their friends, or some innocent person on the street - days 1-29 mean absolutely nothing. Everyone will live with that the rest of their lives, but no one more than the parents that allowed it. Kids are supposed to make mistakes, and they will - and parents are supposed to understand that - and have guidelines to help prevent serious lapses. And we also have the right, as parents, to raise our kids as we think best, and as pointed out - everyone is a little different. The law, however, is very clear - 17 is a minor, period. We also have a legal curfrew for 16 year olds here - and it's 11. So someone with the authority to make that decision doesn't think that past 11 is appropriate, and they base these decisions based on the statistics. I guess for 17 year olds - it's up to the parents. So, allowing him to stay out is one thing, but allowing him to be out with a vehicle that in a split second could become a lethal weapon (when the law says he can't even own it, yet) - would make me irresponsible. And that's certainly not an example that I want to set for my son. Since his best friend's parents have no problem with this, they can provide their car:)

It's strange that I was the one that posted asking for advice, but there were a couple of things that I read that really concerned me so I'm gonna offer some humble comments of my own.

The comment that really concerned me was the mom who mentioned something about knowing that her son drinks and smokes pot, and I think there was a reply later on that said if that parent had known for a fact that was going on - their kid wouldn't be going out. I whole heartedly agree with that. While I think that it's great that there is such a close relationship that your son actually tells you that he does these things - I can only respond by saying that's a situation that certainly has the potential for disaster. Every drug addiction and every drinking problem start somewhere - and they usually don't start as problems. Unfortunately, there's no meter or test that we can give each kid that will tell us which one is going to sow wild oats and which one is going to develop a life long addiction that they're going to struggle with. And even if you believe that it is for recreation and experimental right now, six months from now it may not be. I know that trying to step in now with a non-tolerance policy would be difficult, and I certainly don't have an easy fix answer to that one - but it won't be as difficult as trying to correct fun turned dangerous later on. Remember that by the time you know it's become a problem, he still won't. It can take years, if ever, to even get a person to the point of admitting that they have a problem, so I'd be very careful with that one.

The other comment that really caught my attention was about the 14 year old that stays out until 2. My first thought was - wow! But then it occurred to me that I don't think it was ever mentioned 'where' he was until 2. And then I remembered that yes, our son, was allowed at that age to be out that late from time to time too. They used to like to go to laser bowling and to late movies, and I really never had a problem with that. There was no cars involved. We or another parent had to pick them up, and they had no means of going elsewhere - so we knew where they were.

But one night when the kids were staying here at that age, I heard the door open about 2, and I went running to see what was going on. They wanted to go - where? - I have no idea. They didn't get to. But, I came to find out that when they stayed at his best friend's house - well, sure they could go out at 2. His parents - they're cool - they didn't care - shoot, they didn't even know:) I wasn't surprised, either - I often wondered if there was anything these people would object to (and due to the length of this already - I won't go into a few of the things they allowed their daughter to do - which I have yet to find anyone who thinks I'm not joking when I tell them. Anyway, I've always like the kid, and he learned from an early age that things his parents may have let them do - they weren't going to do here. But his parents allowing anything became my worst nightmare these last four years, and had I had a crystal ball back in kindergarten, I really think I would have tried to encourage our son to develop stronger relationships with other kids who's parents didn't let them do this sort of stuff - so, too lenient, can actually cost them friends too.

Anyway back to the 2 in the morning in the neighborhood - we asked him about this, and he said yes, they rode bikes, and played basketball - and there were a couple of other friends that they'd go back and forth to - all night long. I told him at that point that nothing good was going to come from that. Of course, it became a debate - because he said they weren't doing anything, and I did believe him - but that wasn't the point.

Assume that you hear something outside tonight at 2 in the morning - and you look out and see kids in the street. What are you going to think? Assume you recognize one or all of them - and you know that it's your neighbor's kids. Now, let's assume you get up tomorrow morning and something has been vandalized? What are you going to logically assume?

And two weeks later, that's exactly what happened - except nothing was vandalized. A neighbor heard these kids, looked out - and called the police on them. A squad car came and wanted to know what in the heck they were doing? Luckily, they weren't doing anything, but the officer told them they didn't have any business being out that late - and to get inside. Well, being young and rebellious - someone had to mouth off. He ended up taking them home, telling the next person that opened their mouth he was going to take them in, and he asked to see the parents - who still thought this was no big deal - but freely admitted that they didn't know they were outside. Obviously, he didn't stay there again for a very long time.

The point I'm trying to make, though - is that even allowing your kids to be somewhere they don't really belong, at a time they don't belong, whether they are doing anything or not - you're allowing them to be in a situation where should something happen, they might be blamed for doing something they didn't do. And, you know kids - all it takes is that split second for one to pick up a rock, throw it wrong - never intended to do it - but it happens. Only it wouldn't have happened if they hadn't been there in the first place.

And that's where I totally agree with the comment that your first job is being a parent - not a buddy or a friend. And you can be a parent and still have your kids know that they can come to you with anything. I was not a wild kid - I was the offspring of a totally wild kid:) (my poor gramma). Yet, my mother was very strict (in some areas). She, too, believed in phrases like 'because I said so', 'it's my house, my rules,' - you know. But, her strictness was due more to fear - terror of something bad happening. Understandable, when you lose two children - so, thinking that it always happens to someone else - it doesn't. And like I do joke with my son - I have a job to do - which is to be a parent - part of that is making sure that he's safe, fed, clothed, has shelter, has an education so that he can take care of himself, is as emotionally happy and stable as possible, and to not release a menace into society. So, in doing that job, if he's 25 and needs a therapist - he can sue me, and then he can think about the fact that he's around to sue me - which means I still did something right:)

Anyway, thanks again for taking time out of your day to share your thoughts with me They really did help! And if anyone else has anything to add - feel free:)

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 PM.

© 2022 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved.
Do not copy or redistribute in any form!